"Europeism, the highest stage of servility". 

Paraphrasing Lenin (1), the essay that the great Russian revolutionary would write today would probably be this: "Europeanism, the highest stage of servility".

In fact, studying the history of the European Union from the perspective of the relationship between governments and citizens, it does not escape anyone that it has been a progressive subjugation (but planned from the beginning, therefore inherent in the very idea of ​​Union) of sovereign states that had to give their sovereignty to a superior assembly of governments endowed with superior and absolute powers. From one treaty to the next, citizens' rights have been gradually sacrificed for an unspecified higher good (read: profits of an elite beyond any control).

And this at all levels, from fundamental issues - such as war - to the most frivolous details such as the shape of bananas or cucumbers to be placed on the market. Citizens' opinion has been the object of continuous, intense and pervasive manipulation, a system that has used all the media (TV, press, cultural institutions) with an acribic commitment that would make Edward Bernais (2) envious, the nephew of Sigmund Freud and father of the engineering of the manipulation of mass consensus.

It was Atlantic servility but now that US citizens tired of being bled dry to bring war throughout the world have turned their backs on the "Demo(nial)crats", in particular the infernal trio Clinton H., Obama and Biden and have elected a new president who no longer wants to know about wars, the true masters of the EU emerge, that is, the monopolistic and imperialistic capital that in all fields (energy, medicine, war) draws its immense profits

Having said that, it must be added that those who see Trump as the savior are equally wrong: he too is a son of the system, perhaps even a "vile businessman" like another well-known figure who was in government for a few years to ruin Italy, but unlike the aforementioned, he also thinks of the interests of the citizens who re-elected him to say enough to wars. Proof of the popular support for his re-election is the undeniable fact that the person who governed until January 2025 thanks to manipulated or stolen elections has in the meantime been recognized as the worst representative of the deeply corrupt system and that it was useless to change horses with a nobody who was eventually put forward as a candidate by the demon(onio)cratic party. Therefore, it was not an enthusiastic decision but rather a prudent consideration to choose the "least worst" given that the situation offered no alternatives.

 The acid test (in the true sense of the word) will be if Trump obeys the diktat of the current Israeli prime minister to the end and agrees to be an accomplice in a war against Iran.

 Which unfortunately I consider very likely if China (and all the Brix) do not intervene in time by seeking an alliance against the war and if they do not work to extend the alliance to save peace and to end the genocide of the Palestinians by shaking the sleeping Arab rulers who until now have been prone to turning a blind eye to the Zionist atrocities that will gradually extend to their detriment.

 That Trump does not care about the Palestinian tragedy has been amply demonstrated: the ceasefire he had boasted about evidently served only to supply the Zionist state with bombs to complete the ongoing genocide: but as profound experts from within the system such as Jeffrey Sachs remind us (recently also in a speech to the European Parliament). The dependence of the US political system on the Israeli Zionists through their US lobby is pervasive and this is the price to be paid by any US president for re-election (and many clues that the declassification and publication of internal CIA and FBI documents are revealing suggest - JFKennedy docet - that on the contrary disobeying is paid with one's life).

 It is no coincidence that in Brussels the lobbyists, that is, the corruptors in the pay of capital (15,000 officially registered) work to obtain from the parliamentarians and officials of the EU the laws that favor the interests of their principals.

 But the system is faltering: and the crazy increase in censorship is opening the eyes of a growing number of citizens. Not the young people, at least not yet, ensnared by climate propaganda with the traditional method of idols built ad hoc (and demolished when they are not needed or do not work according to instructions: Poor Greta Thunberg abused in Davos to propagate climate terrorism, also sent to kiss Zelensky's ass on the occasion of the collapse attributed to Russian artillery of a dam in Donbass, was erased as soon as she uttered a word of condemnation of the genocide in Palestine).

 Unfortunately on the one hand but fortunately looking to the future, Europe has also economically emasculated itself: with Russophobic terror. A method similar to the incitements of the Nazi leaders to convince the population of the Bolshevik danger - non-existent even then, so much so that there was the Molotov-von Ribbentrop agreement in 1939. The consequences that then only affected the European countries directly involved will this time affect the entire continent, if history repeats itself as everything fears. Tragically the ridiculous "survival kit" for 72 hours will prove to be greatly exaggerated, if madness prevails, it will be a few hours or minutes, that day that we hope will never come the sun that rose on a Europe driven to suicide would set on the radioactive ashes of the entire continent.

 The 1939 treaty was also a fiction, similar to the two Minsk I and Minsk II treaties, which if implemented would have guaranteed peace in Europe but were used to buy time to arm the unfortunate Ukrainians, programmed by the Anglo-American empire as cannon fodder against Russia.

 When Lenin published his treatise on imperialism over a hundred years ago he had to make cuts to the text to escape Tsarist censorship.

 If someone were to similarly write a treatise against the EU today he would have much greater difficulties: first of all they would close his bank account as in fact happened to a well-known Italian publisher. And he would hardly be able to present the book in public because he would be denied theaters or cinemas.

 So as far as the EU is concerned, Dante's quote "abandon all hope, ye who enter here" applies: but this should not discourage but rather incite ... to leave as soon as possible.

 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 (1) Ленин В.И. - (Imperialism as the supreme phase of capitalism) (1917).

 (2) Edward Bernais: Crystallizing Public Opinion (1923)